What Percent of Statistics are Made Up?
When someone comes to a forum and posts 56% of xxx are yyy. My usual retort is "78% of statistics are made up on the spot".
But how accurate is this, really? Is it 78% or did I pull that number out of nowhere?
There is much disagreement on this important subject. A quick Google search revealed how far this disagreement has gotten.
This guy says its 98%. Improbable. Someone out there -has- to be throwing about actual information.
This guy says its 47.3% (but later corrected it to be 43.7%) - not credible, obviously. If you can't type, you surely can't make up a believable number.
This guy says its 96%. So he's an optimist; compared to the guy who thinks that 98% are made up.
Being the internet, what is the definitive source of such information? Google? Nope. Wikipedia? Good lord, no. Yahoo? I laugh.
It's spam of course. From the spam email archive; 95% of statistics are made up on the spot.
I'll be damned...could I have been wrong? Wait. In my never ending quest to be right; this site claims that 77% of statistics are made up. I think I'll go with that; but add a margin of error (1%) to the number.
Therefore, my original assertion that 78% of statistics are made up is completely accurate. And; when dealing with fake numbers, accuracy is important. Ask Lancet, they know all about fake numbers and accuracy, they'd agree with me.
(For the record, I spelt "statistics" wrong about 10 different times in this post - I think I found all the spelling errors, though. 78% of people do spell statistics wrong on the first try, you know).
April 27th, 2007 - 06:18
Mine 98% was a mis-remembered Vic Reeves quote – he actually said 88.2%
May 26th, 2009 - 22:31
Well I would think that all statistics are made up. The ones that sight a reputable source sometimes have empirical evidence, though.