<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Cutts on Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links</link>
	<description>Lorien1973</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Loves Low Quality Sites: Read it at Lorien1973.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links/comment-page-1#comment-5722</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Loves Low Quality Sites: Read it at Lorien1973.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links/#comment-5722</guid>
		<description>[...] a follow-up to yesterday&#8217;s Google rant, I wanted to follow-up and show you how Google is breaking it&#8217;s own definition of quality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a follow-up to yesterday&#8217;s Google rant, I wanted to follow-up and show you how Google is breaking it&#8217;s own definition of quality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael VanDeMar</title>
		<link>http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links/comment-page-1#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lorien1973.com/matt-cutts-on-paid-links/#comment-5662</guid>
		<description>Lorien, I&#039;m not sure what you meant about my post &quot;missing the point.&quot; I was talking about a comment that Matt made about a completely different class of paid ads... AdWords.

Also, although I do agree with your issues, I think you misinterpreted something Matt said (I think Any got it wrong too). When Matt referred to &quot;a site which appears to be promoting a specific manufacturer of medical equipment via paid posts&quot; I&#039;m pretty sure he was actually talking about the target site that was trying to rank, not the post that contained the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorien, I&#8217;m not sure what you meant about my post &#8220;missing the point.&#8221; I was talking about a comment that Matt made about a completely different class of paid ads&#8230; AdWords.</p>
<p>Also, although I do agree with your issues, I think you misinterpreted something Matt said (I think Any got it wrong too). When Matt referred to &#8220;a site which appears to be promoting a specific manufacturer of medical equipment via paid posts&#8221; I&#8217;m pretty sure he was actually talking about the target site that was trying to rank, not the post that contained the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

